Feature Requests
297 results found
-
Custom Engine Modes - Dynamic project name regex by changed project name
Hello,
we have the following naming conversion:
Company.ComponentA.Foo.dll
Company.ComponentA.Foo_uTest.dllI want the relevant unit test dlls to be selected based on the changed product projects.
As an addition the mapping should be flexible and support:
1. Just the unit test target of the changed product target should be used
2. All unit test targets of a changed component should be used.Idea:
1. Selection Pattern for the changed project
'^(\w+[.]\w+[.]).*$' // Captures "Company.ComponentA."Then a string.Format line to create the regex pattern for the project name selection:
'^{0}._uTest$' which would lead to "Company.ComponentA.._uTest"
=> All unit tests of…
1 vote -
Custom Engine Modes - Project name matches regex
Hello,
I want to use regex to match project names because in our projects there is a naming rule:<Product-Assembly> has a corresponding unit test target with the name:
<Product-Assembly>_uTestTherefore I want to define a rule like:
Project name matches regex '^.*_uTest$'With best regards,
stefan1 vote -
Add filter in "test popup" window
So I navigate code and possible spot an issue, I click on line to bring up the "tests covering this line" and I am interested in a test containing a string e.g. "NoOfQueries" but I am a bit overwelmed with the no of tests for this code so I cannot find it.
Current workaround is to pin all tests covering it, and then add a text filter in the Tests window (and then unpin all tests which kindof ruins my current "pinned tests scope").
1 vote -
Synchronize the "NCrunch Configuration" Window with the selected project in "NCrunch Tests" Window
Or add a Toggle Button to enable this mode
1 vote -
1 vote
-
Allow a test project to be excluded from creating inline code coverage
Inline code coverage is great for unit tests, but when integration tests are also instrumented we lose the granularity of coverage.
N.B Our integration tests are for testing the interaction of our classes either with each other, or 3rd party libraries. So running them in ncrunch and getting test failure notifications straight away is useful for us.
1 vote -
Attribute to enable tests with "shared resource" to run on same server within same "session".
Original thread: http://forum.ncrunch.net/yaf_postst1368_Restrict-multiple-tests-to-run-within-same-grid-node-in-console-runner.aspx
This is primarily for the console test runner (or e.g engine mode "run all tests within automatically").
Scenario: I have some integration tests using large test data. This test data is created once and then reused between these tests. When using grid nodes tests using same "test data resource" might end up running in different grid nodes, causing each test creating new test data (which makes the tests slower than if they were run in serial).
It would be nice to have an attribute e.g. [SharedResource("TestBlob")] making all tests with same "shared resource" to be run within…
1 vote -
Show the PID of process in which a test is running
I whish to be able to see the PID of the currently running test when I break in it. Thus to allow to attach a performance analyzer.
1 vote -
Risk/Progress window move to toolbar (status bar) with progress bar. Add text "xxx/yyy test pass"
Risk/Progress window move to toolbar (status bar) with progress bar. Add text "xxx/yyy test pass"
Reason: unable dock this windows in right position when clip/unclip (auto hide ) dock panels.
1 vote -
Provide an option to only enable grid node when machines has no active user sessions
I'd love to make use of the latent power of all the locked desktops in my office but don't want to risk using nodes when someone is logged in.
1 vote -
1 vote
-
Remote server: Run test on all (connected) servers
I have a test which is required to be run manually to reset the environment to a initial state.
I would like the option to run the test on all servers at once. Now I have to select "run test on server X" for each server I have which is tedious.(This feature would also be good to ensure a particular test is passing on all servers).
1 vote -
Support UITestMethod in Windows Store apps
Posted in response to: forum.ncrunch.net/yafpostsm5807UITestMethod-not-recognized.aspx.
Currently NCrunch ignores test methods with UITestMethod attribute which forces the test to run on the UI thread. This is required whenever the test needs to manipulate a UI element even if it's not a UI test in itself.
1 vote -
Add ability to bottleneck ncrunch
Sometimes I have tests which are unstable on the buildserver, since the specs of the buildserver are slower. Even when I crunch the tests locally, they still never fail. (Usually frontend tests, making use of bUnit rendering)
I would find it handy to be able to crunch tests with a forced bottleneck, limiting resources, allowing me to reproduce the buildserver circumstances.
1 vote -
Allow multiple simultaneous instances with different filters
It would be great if I could get multiple risk/progress bars pointed at different categories of tests. I would like to see (for instance) one risk/progress bar for acceptance, one for integration, and one for unit tests. It would be great if these were full parallel instances - like with their own configuration and everything. For instance, having acceptance tests farmed out to servers makes a lot of sense but all my unit tests should run locally because it takes longer to farm out a batch than to run it.
0 votes -
Add "Title" field for simplified grid node management and identification
As a NCrunch user, I would like to have an easy way to identify and manage my grid node while using distributing processing window.
Currently, "server name" field is the only way to identify remote servers. With automated, disposable, DevOps-iified infrastructure, such identification is highly desiured. Out server names are random strings, such as this:
MB-{RANDOM-8-CHARS}
- MB-DMHJBDTDD
- MB-THDRFBDF
- MB-MKDHSVTD
We don't really care or have control over this while scaling grid nodes infrastructure.
It would be nice to have an additional field "Title" or "Display Title" for grid node so that we can have a human-readable name for randomly generated…
0 votes -
In Test window, Server column for grouping rows should include all servers for children (not just one of them).
In my case Server always says "(Local)" if any child test ran locally. I think this should be a comma-delimited list like Category. Next best thing would be leaving it blank.
If I'm filtering for failed tests only, the current behavior is really a bug, because all of the failing tests may have ran on one node server that isn't (local), yet the grouping row alone still says (local). So it makes scanning the server column to troubleshoot issues (in this case node server dependency config issues) confusing.
0 votes
- Don't see your idea?