Feature Requests

I suggest you ...

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  1. Support Install Directory Outside of AppData

    Due to security restrictions on programs executing out of AppData at my company, they whitelist another directory where we can install development software. Because NCrunch does not allow an install directory outside of AppData, I am unable to get it to work under this security policy.

    It is pretty common to allow custom install paths, so I am requesting that you support this feature for NCrunch as well.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Add "Configure selected component" RMB menu on NCrunch project warnings

    [v3.22]
    Today I can select a project in NCrunch Tests window and RMB and choose "Configure selected component" to easily find it in the NCrunch Configuration pane.
    However for project warnings I cannot do this (e.g. for warning "NCrunch detected unusual behaviour around the resolution of referenced assemblies required by this project in its test environment"). and must manually navigate to the project in the configuration pane, which is tedious for large solutions.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Add "/VS" switch (vstudio version) to grid node server configuration

    I have some tests requiring vs2013, these work fine with ncrunch.exe since I can use the /VS version.
    However when I use vs2017 for local development the tests are failing (since the grid node uses vs2017 if that is available).
    I would like the grid node configuration to be able to specifiy a vs version to use, so I can dedicate 1 grid node to run in vs2013 environment (in combination with capabilities to ensure such tests are run on that)

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Option to suppress TC service msg "NCrunch result: TestFailure" in console tool

    From https://forum.ncrunch.net/yaf_postst2618_NCrunch-Console-and-TeamCity-muted-tests.aspx

    I want to be able to utilize TeamCity Test Muting (see https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/TCD18/Muting+Test+Failures ) and therefore I need NCrunch to not report build failure via TC service message if a test fails.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Option to enter debugger when churn mode makes a test fail

    I would like to use churn mode for a single test and make NCrunch enter the debugger as soon as churn mode was able to fail the test.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Visual Studio (Mac)

    Now that Visual Studio is available on the Mac, it would be nice for tools like this to be available for Mac users too.

    8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Support Expecto

    It would be great if NCrunch could integrate with Expecto (https://github.com/haf/expecto).

    8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Attribute to identify type/methods that must have 100% code coverage

    It would be helpful to have NCrunch treat (or at least report) decreases in code coverage as "fail".

    For example, supporting an attribute that marks a project/class/method as "100% code coverage required".

    Or a larger flag such that any code coverage drop is a "failure". This would be a bit trickier to support as it may need to be include a way to identify a baseline. And it may be helpful to distinguish between coverage for old code vs coverage for new code.

    I think starting with a numeric attribute indicating the required coverage would give the biggest ROI --…

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Integrate with the upcoming project rider, similar to what WallabyJS does

    Integrate with the upcoming IDE from jetbrains to support project rider. Project rider is already available for download. Based on intellij. NCrunch couldn't do exactly what WallabyJS is doing and providing a number of IDE integrations.

    158 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Support for Paket

    Paket is an alternative package manager that support NuGet packages. Currently NCrunch will auto detect NuGet packages that have build targets in the csproj and copy the tools folder into the workspace for that package.

    This does not work when using Paket and requires manual fixup of the additional files to include the tools folders.

    Please add support for Paket based NuGet references in the same way as NuGet is supported.

    7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Coverage on If statements

    Ncrunch does not appear to check all conditions in an if statement for 100% coverage.
    i.e. if (x || y) only requires that x is tested, not y.

    22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Support the new Visual Studio Code IDE

    Support the new Visual Studio Code editor.
    While it doesn't yet provide extensibility for utils like NCrunch, it is apparently planned for upcoming development, so I wanted to get this on the NCrunch radar.

    102 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. ternary coverage

    Increase resolution of coverage so that a ternary expression shows code coverage if one branch is not covered. (Otherwise my team is going to make me always use 8-line ifs instead of 1-line ternaries just so we can see code coverage completely :'( )

    21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. NCrunch Console Tools provide TeamCity Code Coverage Stats

    You can check TeamCity documentation here: https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/TCD9/Custom+Chart#CustomChart-CustomBuildMetrics

    CodeCoverageB Block-level code coverage %

    •CodeCoverageC Class-level code coverage %

    •CodeCoverageL Line-level code coverage %

    •CodeCoverageM Method-level code coverage %

    •CodeCoverageAbsLCovered The number of covered lines int

    •CodeCoverageAbsMCovered The number of covered methods int

    •CodeCoverageAbsCCovered The number of covered classes int

    •CodeCoverageAbsLTotal The total number of lines int

    •CodeCoverageAbsMTotal The total number of methods int

    •CodeCoverageAbsCTotal The total number of classes int

    29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Add button to enable/disable word wrap in test output window

    The test output window currently wraps text which can make it difficult to read stack traces. An option to disable word wrap would be helpful, especially if it could be toggled via a button on the window itself.

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Improve hover-over hints on tests indicators/icons in 'NCrunch Tests' window

    Oh boy, we still have absolutely no idea what do some icons mean. Really.

    All these alerts icons on the test/assembly row, then green or red clocks, then green question marks. That IS so much puzzling. Seems we lived in VS space too much, at least it was simple - not run, run and pass/failed :)

    Please add hints on hover-over providing an explanation and suggestion on what is going on with the current test or whole test set.

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Stress-debug flaky tests

    Flaky tests are difficult to catch under a debugger due to the time it takes to start a new debugging session. It is frustrating to click the "Run the selected test(s) with debugger" button over and over again, waiting 5-15 seconds for each run.

    It would be wonderful if we could tell NCrunch to debug a given test 100 times in a row, giving the test a chance to fail with the debugger attached. The behavior should be similar to running multiple tests with debugger attached, though in actuality it would be the same test running again and again.

    9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Support Xamarin

    Build an addin for Xamarin studio

    31 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Copy engine mode

    I have fairly non trivial engine modes with test filters set. I want to create a new engine mode based on existing but only tweak e.g. a condition in the filter.
    It would help a lot if could copy an existing engine mode and tweak it instead of re-doing the entire filter.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feature Requests

Feedback and Knowledge Base