Feature Requests

I suggest you ...

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  1. Enhance 'NCrunch Distributed Processin -> Server Tasks' window with additional information

    It would be nice to enhance 'NCrunch Distributed Processin -> Server Tasks' window adding more context.

    Right now it shows 'Processing Taks: 1 test(s) in XXXXX.Test', so would be nice to expand on that and show what are the tests being run right now with that task.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)

      We’ll send you updates on this idea

      0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    • Enable columns grouping on both "NCrunch Distributed Processing'" and "NCrunch Tests" window

      Please enable grouping on "NCrunch Distributed Processing'" and "NCrunch Tests" window grids so that it would be possible to have extra dimension on grouping servers by capabilities, or tests by "Excecution status".

      With dozens servers we have to keep up with the name convention, naming the servers in a specific way. Grouping by capabilities would be a better choice.

      Same same with tests - grouping by excecution status, 'failed, being run, passed' would be just awesome to have - similar to out of the box Visual Studio tests window.

      1 vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        Signed in as (Sign out)

        We’ll send you updates on this idea

        0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      • Optimize test status refresh between VS reloads on large amount of tests

        Once VS loads, NCrunch seems to refresh tests status.

        We noticed performance degradation on 500-1000+ tests.
        It takes about 10 minutes (1 test per second or somehting) to get the whole suit refreshed on the status.

        Always '500+' tests are queried for execution, 100 failing, no tests ignored. Hope that VS won't go down, as NCrunch will start that refresh process again from the very beginning.

        With current config we have ~1000 tests and 8 Azure VMs in the grid, 4CPU + 8G RAM.

        1 vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          Signed in as (Sign out)

          We’ll send you updates on this idea

          0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        • Add confirmation on deleting server node

          Please add a confirmation dialog "You sure you want to delete a node" while deleting a server node from the server nodes list.

          1 vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            Signed in as (Sign out)

            We’ll send you updates on this idea

            0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          • Support for NSpec

            I'd love to run my nspec.org tests via ncrunch.

            16 votes
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              Signed in as (Sign out)

              We’ll send you updates on this idea

              3 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            • Configurable list of custom ItemGroups to be copied over to workspace

              More details - http://forum.ncrunch.net/yaf_postsm7334_Custom-ItemGroups-to-be-copied-over-to-workspace.aspx#post7334

              The scenario is coming up with some shared logic to be used by other teams. They have the freedom to add build targets, so list of custom items used isn't fixed.

              Currently NCrunch just copies over None or Content or Compile items. Having a configurable list of such items will help avoiding workarounds like adding the item twice.

              7 votes
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                Signed in as (Sign out)

                We’ll send you updates on this idea

                0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              • Add host spot detection.

                Add the ability to highlight risky code paths to help a developer focus their attention on un-covered code paths.

                Hot spots should be defined by areas of high cyclomatic complexity and low test coverage similar to the functionality found in JetBrains dotCover.

                3 votes
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  Signed in as (Sign out)

                  We’ll send you updates on this idea

                  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                • output window hyperlink for logging file and line number in standard visual studio format

                  The output window currently requires the format "path: line number" which is not the format supported by visual studio. Visual studio windows require "path (line): message".

                  Please add support for the visual studio standard format to allow hyperlinks to work in all windows.

                  2 votes
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    Signed in as (Sign out)

                    We’ll send you updates on this idea

                    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                  • Allow to run the tests on the grid node while the foreground solution is still compiling

                    When working with large solutions, it would be great if the grid nodes would already compile/execute tests in parallel while the foreground solution is still compiling in Visual Studio.

                    For the moment it seems that whenever I trigger a re-build, NCrunch is pausing to wait for completion. As the re-build takes several minutes (5-10), that seems to be a quite large delay to wait for the test results.

                    My usage scenario is that I have several grid nodes with some RAM drives (having 2-4 GB capacity) and a large solution with around 160 projects. Thus, when executing, some of my…

                    1 vote
                    Sign in
                    Check!
                    (thinking…)
                    Reset
                    or sign in with
                    • facebook
                    • google
                      Password icon
                      Signed in as (Sign out)

                      We’ll send you updates on this idea

                      1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                    • Test Filter Builder: Enable filtering by Project Name via regular expressions

                      Test Filter Builder already supports filtering by Full Name with Regular Expression, and it supports filtering by Project Name, but it doesn't appear that there's a way to filter by project name using wildcards/regex.

                      I've got test projects containing pure unit tests, named *.UnitTests as a convention, but the test classes' namespaces are the same as their SUT (system under test) class (the namespaces don't have "*.UnitTests" in them).

                      I'd like to trigger my (pure, fast) UnitTests to run when impacted, but not my integration tests (they're in separate projects named *.IntegrationTests).

                      1 vote
                      Sign in
                      Check!
                      (thinking…)
                      Reset
                      or sign in with
                      • facebook
                      • google
                        Password icon
                        Signed in as (Sign out)

                        We’ll send you updates on this idea

                        0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                      • Allow user to set color of code coverage marks while a test is executing.

                        Currently it only goes a few shades light and it's difficult to see if this is in progress or if it's already passed/failed. Being able to set this color to something like orange gives a clear indication that the test is in progress.

                        Changing the graphic would also work, instead of a green circle it could be a green question mark.

                        2 votes
                        Sign in
                        Check!
                        (thinking…)
                        Reset
                        or sign in with
                        • facebook
                        • google
                          Password icon
                          Signed in as (Sign out)

                          We’ll send you updates on this idea

                          0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                        • Add median, quartil, percentile or truncated mean to "Marker performance aggregation type"

                          First run takes offen more time as following ones. Because of small count of runs in typical unittest scenario, the first outlier has too much weight. In this Case median, quartil, percentile or truncated mean are robust.

                          Ps. It should be simple to implement this. )

                          2 votes
                          Sign in
                          Check!
                          (thinking…)
                          Reset
                          or sign in with
                          • facebook
                          • google
                            Password icon
                            Signed in as (Sign out)

                            We’ll send you updates on this idea

                            0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                          • Deep code coverage tool

                            I was thinking about a better code coverage tool. A tool that take longer to run, but show the real thing.

                            This deep code coverage tool, should test each line of code. If a line is commented, at least one test should fail or an error should be outlined. The tool can do the check and report the lines that are not well covered.

                            The result it's easier to remove the line or improve our tests for a better code coverage.

                            1 vote
                            Sign in
                            Check!
                            (thinking…)
                            Reset
                            or sign in with
                            • facebook
                            • google
                              Password icon
                              Signed in as (Sign out)

                              We’ll send you updates on this idea

                              0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                            • ncrunch "absorb" solution folder structure to organize the tests

                              Can we have ncrunch "absorb" solution folder structure to organise the tests in the test overview window? We currently have two folders (slow and fast) and resharper adheres to that struture (very convenient).

                              I'd like ncrunch to do the same. Could you add that to the Tree structure option in the NCrunch Tests window?

                              6 votes
                              Sign in
                              Check!
                              (thinking…)
                              Reset
                              or sign in with
                              • facebook
                              • google
                                Password icon
                                Signed in as (Sign out)

                                We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                              • Offer a VS toolbar to make switching between engine modes quicker (and visible)

                                NCrunch should offer a VS toolbar to make switching between engine modes quicker (and visible). It's an often-used function and is tedious to do it through the menu.

                                3 votes
                                Sign in
                                Check!
                                (thinking…)
                                Reset
                                or sign in with
                                • facebook
                                • google
                                  Password icon
                                  Signed in as (Sign out)

                                  We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                  3 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                • Custom Engine Modes - Dynamic project name regex by changed project name

                                  Hello,

                                  we have the following naming conversion:
                                  Company.ComponentA.Foo.dll
                                  Company.ComponentA.Foo_uTest.dll

                                  I want the relevant unit test dlls to be selected based on the changed product projects.

                                  As an addition the mapping should be flexible and support:
                                  1. Just the unit test target of the changed product target should be used
                                  2. All unit test targets of a changed component should be used.

                                  Idea:
                                  1. Selection Pattern for the changed project
                                  '^(\w+[.]\w+[.]).*$' // Captures "Company.ComponentA."

                                  Then a string.Format line to create the regex pattern for the project name selection:

                                  '^{0}.*_uTest$' which would lead to "Company.ComponentA..*_uTest"

                                  => All unit tests of a changed…

                                  1 vote
                                  Sign in
                                  Check!
                                  (thinking…)
                                  Reset
                                  or sign in with
                                  • facebook
                                  • google
                                    Password icon
                                    Signed in as (Sign out)

                                    We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                  • Custom Engine Modes - Project name matches regex

                                    Hello,
                                    I want to use regex to match project names because in our projects there is a naming rule:

                                    <Product-Assembly> has a corresponding unit test target with the name:
                                    <Product-Assembly>_uTest

                                    Therefore I want to define a rule like:
                                    Project name matches regex '^.*_uTest$'

                                    With best regards,
                                    stefan

                                    1 vote
                                    Sign in
                                    Check!
                                    (thinking…)
                                    Reset
                                    or sign in with
                                    • facebook
                                    • google
                                      Password icon
                                      Signed in as (Sign out)

                                      We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                      0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                    • Allow mouse-click navigation on stack trace even when instrumentation is off

                                      When instrumentation is ON you can navigate from error stack trace to the code with a single mouse-click (very similar to ReSharper stack trace explorer).
                                      When instrumentation is OFF then mouse-click functionality stops working because NCrunch-specific paths are used in this case. ReSharper Stack Trace Explorer still works fine and is able to handle stack traces from NCrunch correctly.
                                      Original issue reports is here: http://forum.ncrunch.net/yaf_postst1513_Error-StackTrace-is-not-navigatable-when-instrumentation-is-off.aspx

                                      2 votes
                                      Sign in
                                      Check!
                                      (thinking…)
                                      Reset
                                      or sign in with
                                      • facebook
                                      • google
                                        Password icon
                                        Signed in as (Sign out)

                                        We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                        0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                      • Add progress bar to Metrics tree view

                                        I would find the metrics tree view more useful if the code coverage % column had a progress bar in the background. The numbers are great of course, but a progress bar would be much easier to glance at, especially when looking at a large number of rows.

                                        DotCover has a view that shows what I mean well: https://www.jetbrains.com/dotcover/features/img/dotcover-app.png

                                        3 votes
                                        Sign in
                                        Check!
                                        (thinking…)
                                        Reset
                                        or sign in with
                                        • facebook
                                        • google
                                          Password icon
                                          Signed in as (Sign out)

                                          We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                          0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                        • Add an attribute like [Isolated] which applies to each member of a fixture rather than the fixture as a whole

                                          The [Isolated] attribute currently only provides isolation for the fixture, not each test within it. Where tests need to be isolated, they need to be individually annotated.

                                          It would be nice to have an attribute like [IsolateEachMember] which could apply to each test in a fixture.

                                          4 votes
                                          Sign in
                                          Check!
                                          (thinking…)
                                          Reset
                                          or sign in with
                                          • facebook
                                          • google
                                            Password icon
                                            Signed in as (Sign out)

                                            We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                            0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                          • Don't see your idea?

                                          Feature Requests

                                          Feedback and Knowledge Base