GreenMoose

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  3. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose supported this idea  · 
  4. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose commented  · 

    I would like to chip in that this is also useful for normal log output. For instance I have diferent indent for app and test log output (and most often it is the test output I am interested in), the default word wrapping makes the log output windoe unnecessary cluttered to find my test log lines. See example at https://i.imgur.com/KbjSkr1.png

    GreenMoose supported this idea  · 
  5. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose supported this idea  · 
  6. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose commented  · 

    +1 for full coverage attribute. I often add new code (test fixtures/prod code) which I know is "NCrunch covered" now, but want NCrunch console running on CI server fail if those classes drops in coverage (but allow other code to be non covered). This would be a killer feature for CI setups with NCrunch.

    GreenMoose supported this idea  · 
  7. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  11. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  12. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  13. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose supported this idea  · 
  14. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  15. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  16. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  17. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  18. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  19. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose shared this idea  · 
  20. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GreenMoose supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base