Kieren Johnstone

My feedback

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kieren Johnstone commented  · 

    Do you mean coverage in the test itself, or the unit under test?
    If the test itself, I can't imagine any statements after the line expected to throw and exception (and you're in control of this). If in the unit under test, shouldn't a different test check the non-exception code path?

  2. 141 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kieren Johnstone supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kieren Johnstone commented  · 

    There's nothing equivalent I've found yet - just want a simple way to auto-run tests and indicate success/failure, coverage as a bonus

Feedback and Knowledge Base