Kieren Johnstone

My feedback

  1. 217 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    25 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kieren Johnstone supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kieren Johnstone commented  · 

    Do you mean coverage in the test itself, or the unit under test?
    If the test itself, I can't imagine any statements after the line expected to throw and exception (and you're in control of this). If in the unit under test, shouldn't a different test check the non-exception code path?

  3. 144 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kieren Johnstone supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kieren Johnstone commented  · 

    There's nothing equivalent I've found yet - just want a simple way to auto-run tests and indicate success/failure, coverage as a bonus

Feedback and Knowledge Base