Ralf Koban

My feedback

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralf Koban shared this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ralf Koban commented  · 

    I think what you really want is something like NDepend.

  3. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralf Koban supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ralf Koban commented  · 

    Would be really nice, especially when used together with distributed processing.

  4. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralf Koban shared this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralf Koban shared this idea  · 
  6. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralf Koban supported this idea  · 
  7. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralf Koban shared this idea  · 
  8. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralf Koban shared this idea  · 
  9. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ralf Koban commented  · 

    Hi Remco,

    Thanks, I go for the Option to use the StyleCopEnabled property.
    But I had to change $(NCrunch) to '$(NCrunch)' to get it working.

    <PropertyGroup>
    <StyleCopEnabled Condition="'$(NCrunch)' == '1'">false</StyleCopEnabled>
    </PropertyGroup>

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ralf Koban commented  · 

    Hi Remco,

    I'm not sure whether this is feasible especially for large solutions.

    On one side there is already a condition on the Import.
    <Import Project="..\Solution\packages\StyleCop.MSBuild.4.7.49.0\build\StyleCop.MSBuild.Targets" Condition="Exists('..\Solution\packages\StyleCop.MSBuild.4.7.49.0\build\StyleCop.MSBuild.Targets')" />

    On the other side, the Import is automatically added by the NuGet package, so each time we update to a new version, we need to manually adjust the condition. We have solutions with more than 160 projects, so it takes quite a long time for that adjustment (and can easily go wrong / miss something).

    Are there other options already available?

    Ralf Koban shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base