Skip to content

Ralf Koban

← NCrunch Feature Suggestions

My feedback

9 results found

  1. Allow to exclude/include files for "Autodetect Nuget build dependencies"

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Ralf Koban shared this idea  · 

  2. Attribute to identify type/methods that must have 100% code coverage

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ralf Koban commented  · 

    I think what you really want is something like NDepend.

  3. Mutation Testing

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Ralf Koban supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ralf Koban commented  · 

    Would be really nice, especially when used together with distributed processing.

  4. Provide parallelized execution time on Performance markers

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Ralf Koban shared this idea  · 

  5. Allow to run the tests on the grid node while the foreground solution is still compiling

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Ralf Koban shared this idea  · 

  6. Add an attribute like [Isolated] which applies to each member of a fixture rather than the fixture as a whole

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Ralf Koban supported this idea  · 

  7. Provide history of failed tests

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Ralf Koban shared this idea  · 

  8. Show number of lines uniquely covered by a test

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Ralf Koban shared this idea  · 

  9. Option to disable stylecop MSBuild integration

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ralf Koban commented  · 

    Hi Remco,

    Thanks, I go for the Option to use the StyleCopEnabled property.
    But I had to change $(NCrunch) to '$(NCrunch)' to get it working.

    <PropertyGroup>
    <StyleCopEnabled Condition="'$(NCrunch)' == '1'">false</StyleCopEnabled>
    </PropertyGroup>

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ralf Koban commented  · 

    Hi Remco,

    I'm not sure whether this is feasible especially for large solutions.

    On one side there is already a condition on the Import.
    <Import Project="..\Solution\packages\StyleCop.MSBuild.4.7.49.0\build\StyleCop.MSBuild.Targets" Condition="Exists('..\Solution\packages\StyleCop.MSBuild.4.7.49.0\build\StyleCop.MSBuild.Targets')" />

    On the other side, the Import is automatically added by the NuGet package, so each time we update to a new version, we need to manually adjust the condition. We have solutions with more than 160 projects, so it takes quite a long time for that adjustment (and can easily go wrong / miss something).

    Are there other options already available?

    Ralf Koban shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)