Skip to content

Darius Damalakas

My feedback

3 results found

  1. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darius Damalakas commented  · 

    Seems like an edge case scenario to me. I do get run into situations when sometimes a test passes, and when run in conjunction with the others it passes, but then it's about test isolation. Don't think you need this feature in order to resolve this. (If i've understood your intention right)

  2. 45 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darius Damalakas commented  · 

    What's the use case for that?
    Sliding build delay, or this feature: https://ncrunch.uservoice.com/forums/245203-feature-requests/suggestions/6401826-option-to-build-and-start-running-test-only-on-fil , would that address your need?

  3. 45 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darius Damalakas commented  · 

    This would be nice. 3 votes from me. I have a build delay option, but hooking up on 'save' would work much better hear - just simply don't build until i press save (ctrl+s, or ctrl+shift+s).

    Darius Damalakas supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base