Bart Joy

My feedback

  1. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  4. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  5. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  7. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  8. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  9. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  10. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  11. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  12. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy commented  · 

    Remco, in answer to your question:
    > I'm trying to establish if people want this because they find NCrunch's 'Ignored Tests' to be too limited/cumbersome.

    I think the engine-mode based filter would allow users to easily "ignore" and "unignore" tests. Sometimes I don't want to permanently filter out tests by ignoring them, but only focus on a particular subset that's appropriate to what I'm working on now.

    Bart Joy commented  · 
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
    Bart Joy commented  · 

    I would like tests to be hidden in the UI for a variety of reasons:

    1. I've ignored them in NCrunch.
    2. I've marked the test as `Explicit` via the NUnit attribute, and don't want to run it manually.
    3. I've added a category and configured the engine mode to exclude that category.
    4. I've configured the engine mode to exclude tests via other criteria, such as Serial tests.

    Right now, I can hide tests under category 1. However, for any other scenario, such as 2, 3, and 4, I have to either put up with the NCrunch Tests window being very cluttered with tests that I don't care about right now, or manually find those tests and mark them as ignored.

    It would be great if I could tell NCrunch to only show tests that are candidates for being run under my current engine mode. Everything else is just UI clutter.

  13. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy commented  · 

    Maybe this could be linked into the engine mode, so that only tests that match the current engine mode are considered? Ignoring by category could be one criterion that could be used to filter tests that are displayed in the UI or considered candidates for running. Anything else would be excluded, and - even if if failed in the past - would not affect the aggregate "pass / fail", or "Red Ring of Shame" as it is called in the original forum discussion.

    Possibly related to:
    https://ncrunch.uservoice.com/forums/245203-feature-requests/suggestions/5677317-test-window-filter

    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  14. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy commented  · 

    Does the Processing Queue achieve what you want? It's available in the NCrunch menu.

  15. 45 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy supported this idea  · 
  16. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bart Joy shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base